RSRAGAN - United Arab Emirates
Posted 14 Jul 09
LC calls for and Inspection Certificate and signature of the signing party to be verified by the negotiating bank.Documents have been presented to the issuing bank with signature on the inspection certificate verified by the negotiating bank along with copy of the passport of the signing individual (not called for in the LC). Upon scrutiny by the issuing bank it is observed that the signature that appears on the inspection certificate and the copy of the passport (which was not called for in the LC) included in the presentation are totally different. What should be the stand of the issuing bank?[edited 7/14/2009 6:50:16 PM: clarity]
..............
JSMITH - United Kingdom
Posted 15 Jul 09
By what means did the credit require that the negotiating bank verify the inspection certificate signer's signature?
..............
RSRAGAN - United Arab Emirates
Posted 15 Jul 09
The clause goes on like:Inspection Certificate issued and signed by Mr.xxx holder of xx Passport No certifying that the goods have been inspected and found to be in good order and condition, whose signature appearing on the Inspection Certificate to be verified by a bank in beneficiary's country and in evidence a notation reading "signature verified" and bearing the stamp and signature of the verifying bank must appear thereon.
................
N.H. Duc - Viet Nam
Posted 15 Jul 09
Hi,I think the document is acceptable if the signature is verified by the negotiating bank in the manner as required. The copy of passport presented should be disregarded as per Article 14 (g). What’s more. The L/C does not require that the signature on the inspection certificate must match the signature on the passport.Best regards,N.H. Duc
................
JSMITH - United Kingdom
Posted 15 Jul 09
I agree with N.H. Duc. As a result I believe that the stance of the issuing bank should be that there is not any reason to refuse honour by reason of the terms of the credit not having been complied with.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Chào Mr Old Man. tôi có 1 thắc mắc:
Trả lờiXóa-NHXN sau khi trả tiền cho nhà XK, lập tức gửi bộ chứng từ đến cho NHPH
-Nhưng khi chứng từ tới Lybia thì bị thất lạc do bạo động
-Sau khi hết bạo động, NHXN đòi tiền NHPH. Nhưng NHPH ko chịu hoàn trả vì lý do bộ chứng từ đã mất
-NHPH phân tích, nếu thanh toán cho NHXN rồi, ko có bộ chứng từ thì nhà NK ko nhận dc hàng=> nhà NK ko nhận dc hàng thì sẽ ko chịu thanh toán. Cho dù là nhà NK yêu cầu làm giấy bảo lãnh nhận hàng đi nữa thì cũng ko dc, vì bộ chứng từ gốc đã mất.
- Trường hợp này giải quyết như thế nào. NHXN có được thanh toán tiền ko, nhà NK có thể nhận hàng ko?
mr Old Man ơi, giúp mình đi. Mình ko bik làm sao post dc bài nên đành comment ở đây vậy
Trả lờiXóa